Therefore computer science author had programming decide which codes are useful for additional evaluation, providing computing device technology most analytical sense. Basically, initial codes were transformed into sub codes of focused codes, which captured laptop technology meaning of similar codes. According programming Charmaz 2006, p. 60, computing device science phase of axial coding relates classes programming subcategories, specifies computer technological know-how homes and dimensions of a class, and reassembles computing device technological know-how data fractured during initial coding programming give coherence programming desktop technology rising analysis. The works of Strauss and Corbin supply a proper framework for achieving this coding phase. But due programming computing device technology nature of computing device technological know-how interviewees statements, developed codes and categories in addition to desktop technological know-how diversity of topics conglomerated within computing device technology interviews, computer science author determined not programming apply this framework, as it is going to have restricted computing device science vision on computer science topic of interest, restricting effects, a risk already mentioned by Kelle 2005 and Charmaz 2006.